GRACE FARMS: An Architectural Model for Restorative Design
This paper was written by Akos Orban of Noumen Studio as part of his research at the Doctoral School of Moholy-Nagy University of Art and Design.
Between 2019 and 2022, I lived amidst the bustling intensity of urban life in New York City, experiencing the relentless pace and sensory overload of metropolitan existence firsthand. As I prepared to move back to Budapest in December 2021, I made a poignant final visit to Grace Farms in New Canaan, Connecticut. Designed by the renowned Japanese architecture firm SANAA, Grace Farms spans 80 acres of open space where people can experience nature, encounter the arts, pursue justice, foster community, and explore faith. This visit provided a stark contrast to the frenetic urban environment I had grown accustomed to, offering a decisive experience of tranquility and peace, and igniting a need to understand how such spaces can foster mental well-being and emotional comfort.
Currently, my doctoral research focuses on how built environments affect us by blending phenomenological inquiry with neurobiological analysis, thereby contributing to the foundation of neuroarchitecture. I consider neuroarchitecture to be a transdisciplinary field in which environmental psychology plays a central role, offering invaluable connections between first-person phenomenological insights and the empirical findings of neuroscience.
Grace Farms, with its seamless integration of nature and thoughtfully designed spaces, serves as a remarkable example worthy of analysis through the lens of environmental psychology. This essay will explore how Grace Farms exemplifies the potential of architectural design to enhance mental well-being and emotional comfort, providing valuable insights for the inter- and transdisciplinary fields of neuroarchitecture and environmental psychology.
The Architectural and Natural Integration of the River Building
The centerpiece of Grace Farms is the River Building, a masterful creation by SANAA. This sinuous, glass-walled structure meanders through the landscape, seamlessly integrating the natural and built environments. The design follows the land's contours, enhancing flow and continuity, and fostering a tranquil atmosphere that invites deep connection with nature.
The building houses diverse facilities, including a sanctuary, library, gymnasium, and dining room, all harmonizing with the natural setting. These facilities are linked by a continuous, winding path that encourages exploration and interaction. The path's gentle curves and transparent walls promote openness and accessibility, allowing seamless movement between indoor and outdoor spaces.
The transparent walls provide unobstructed views of the surrounding landscape, blurring the boundaries between indoors and outdoors. This design choice maximizes natural light and creates a constant visual connection to the environment, reinforcing the site's ethos of harmony with nature. The glass walls immerse visitors in the landscape, enhancing the sensory experience and promoting peace and relaxation.
Additionally, the building's form and strategically placed facilities contribute to a sense of discovery. As visitors follow the path, they encounter various spatial experiences, each offering unique perspectives of the landscape. This encourages leisurely exploration, making the journey between spaces an integral part of the visitor experience.
The primary attribute of the River Building that I will analyze is its seamless blend with nature. By harmonizing architecture with the natural environment, the building exemplifies how thoughtful design can create spaces that support mental well-being and emotional comfort. This synthesis with nature is essential for understanding the building's impact on visitors and its role as a model for restorative architectural design.
Kaplan’s Predictors of Preference at Grace Farms
Kaplan’s predictors of environmental preference—complexity, coherence, identifiability, and mystery—provide a suitable framework for analyzing the architectural design of the River Building because these predictors are crucial for creating environments that are not only engaging but also psychologically satisfying (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). Complexity is evident in the varied experiences offered by the building and its surroundings. The structure’s undulating form, combined with the diverse natural elements, provides visual and experiential richness. Coherence is maintained through the harmonious integration of architecture and landscape, ensuring a unified and easily understandable environment. Identifiability is achieved through distinct yet interconnected spaces within the building, allowing visitors to navigate effortlessly while maintaining a sense of orientation. Mystery is subtly woven into the design through the building’s fluid lines and transparent walls, which invite exploration and the continual discovery of new perspectives and hidden details. This blend of complexity, coherence, identifiability, and mystery bridges distinct personal preferences, demonstrating the applicability of Kaplan’s framework to the River Building. The design successfully captivates and sustains interest while promoting a sense of comfort and orientation.
Prospect-Refuge Theory at Grace Farms
In addition to Kaplan’s framework, the River Building also exemplifies Jay Appleton’s Prospect-Refuge Theory. This theory suggests that people find environments more attractive when they offer both opportunities to observe (prospect) and areas of safety (refuge) (Appleton, 1975). The open, communal areas of the building provide ample prospect, allowing for unobstructed views of the surrounding natural beauty. Meanwhile, the intimate, secluded spaces within the building offer refuge, creating a sense of safety and retreat.
Grace Farms' remote location far from the city noise itself acts as a significant refuge. Unlike an urban setting, where transparent designs might make one feel exposed, the surrounding forest at Grace Farms provides a natural barrier, enhancing the feeling of protection. From an adaptation standpoint, environments like Grace Farms—with clearings surrounded by trees—have been empirically found to be especially beneficial. Appleton et al. (1983) found that such settings offer a balance of openness and enclosure, fulfilling evolutionary preferences for environments where one can see without being seen.
Wohlwill's Theory and the Optimal Arousal Framework
Daniel E. Wohlwill's theory further supports the significance of natural settings in providing optimal arousal (Wohlwill, 1966; 1976). Wohlwill argues that urban environments tend to be overly complex yet not varied enough, leading to sensory overload and reduced psychological well-being. In contrast, natural environments offer the right balance of complexity and variability, falling within the optimal range for human arousal and engagement. Wohlwill builds on Berlyne's (1960) concept of optimal arousal, suggesting that environments should neither be too stimulating nor too monotonous to maintain interest and mental well-being.
Wohlwill also incorporates James J. Gibson's (1979) ecological psychology, which emphasizes the importance of affordances— the actionable possibilities available in the environment that match human capabilities. The natural settings at Grace Farms offer numerous affordances, such as walking paths, open fields, and quiet nooks, allowing visitors to interact with and adapt to their surroundings in meaningful ways. Grace Farms showcases the characteristics of a natural environment from Wohlwill's perspective, highlighting an architectural approach that blends seamlessly with nature. This variety and balance make Grace Farms an exemplary model of an environment that supports optimal arousal and promotes mental well-being.
Emotional Affordances - An Atmospheric Outlook
In analyzing the human-environment connection, the concept of architectural atmospheres is valuable to environmental psychology. Architectural atmospheres are the sensory and affective qualities that spaces evoke, significantly impacting human experiences and emotions. Tonino Griffero connects the concept of affordances with atmospheres, suggesting that atmospheres can be seen as emotional affordances (Griffero 2014). According to Griffero, atmospheres are the emotional and sensory qualities that permeate space, shaping our mood and perception in subtle but profound ways. These atmospheres are not just about what a space allows us to do physically but also about how it makes us feel. The atmosphere of a place, with its specific blend of light, color, texture, sound, and spatial arrangement, creates an emotional ambiance that can significantly influence our well-being.
At Grace Farms, the architectural atmosphere created by the River Building and its integration with the natural landscape exemplifies these emotional affordances. The building's transparent walls, natural materials, and flowing design elements generate a calming and inviting atmosphere. This ambiance promotes a sense of peace and relaxation, enhancing the restorative qualities of the space. By fostering an emotional connection with the environment, the River Building's atmosphere supports mental well-being and enriches the overall visitor experience.
Restorative Design at Grace Farms
Restorative design is a key aspect of Grace Farms, enhancing its capacity to foster mental well-being and emotional comfort. This concept is rooted in the idea that environments can significantly influence psychological health, particularly through their ability to restore cognitive functions and reduce stress.
Attention Restoration Theory (ART), developed by Stephen and Rachel Kaplan, provides a foundational framework for understanding restorative environments. ART posits that natural settings help restore directed attention, a cognitive resource depleted by urban and high-demand environments (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). According to the Kaplans, restorative environments possess certain qualities: being away (a sense of escape), extent (a sense of being in a whole other world), fascination (holding one's attention effortlessly), and compatibility (matching one's purposes and inclinations).
The visual and informational characteristics of natural environments play a crucial role in their restorative properties. Research suggests that the restorative and healing nature of natural environments arises not primarily from eliminating stress but from facilitating the renewal of directed attention capacity. Due to genetic predispositions, humans can process the informational characteristics of such environments with minimal attentional effort. In natural settings, effortless attention leads to mental restoration (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1982; Dúll et al., 2009; ).
Grace Farms exemplifies these principles through its design. The River Building and its surrounding landscapes offer a variety of engaging yet non-demanding stimuli. The natural meadows, woodlands, and water bodies provide a visually rich yet cognitively effortless experience, fostering a sense of fascination and mental relaxation. Expanding on these aspects, Roger S. Ulrich’s Stress Recovery Theory (SRT) complements ART by focusing on the emotional and physiological benefits of natural environments. Ulrich (1984) argues that natural settings can reduce stress and promote recovery by providing soothing and pleasant sensory experiences. Grace Farms, with its serene landscapes and harmonious architectural elements, aligns with Ulrich's findings, offering a space where visitors can experience reduced stress levels and enhanced emotional well-being. Moreover, Clare Cooper Marcus, and Marni Barnes (1999) emphasize the importance of therapeutic landscapes in promoting health and well-being. Their work highlights how well-designed natural environments can support healing processes. Grace Farms, through its integration of nature and architecture, serves as an exemplary therapeutic landscape, offering a sanctuary for visitors to rejuvenate mentally and emotionally.
Conclusion
Grace Farms exemplifies the potential of architecture to foster mental well-being and emotional comfort through its seamless integration of nature and design. The River Building, with its sinuous form and transparent walls, serves as a case study in restorative architectural design, demonstrating how built environments can harmonize with their natural surroundings to create spaces that support holistic health.
Through the lenses of Kaplan’s predictors of environmental preference, Appleton’s Prospect-Refuge Theory, Wohlwill’s optimal arousal framework, and Griffero's concept of architectural atmospheres, Grace Farms showcases the profound impact that thoughtful design can have on psychological well-being. The variety and balance within the environment at Grace Farms cater to diverse personal preferences and needs, promoting a sense of peace, relaxation, and discovery.
This analysis underscores the importance of creating environments that not only fulfill functional requirements but also enhance mental and emotional well-being. By synthesizing environmental psychology with architectural design principles, we can develop a deeper understanding of the dynamic relationship between humans and their environments. This integrated approach offers invaluable insights into how design can support mental health and emotional comfort. Grace Farms serves as a model for future architectural projects, illustrating how spaces can be designed to promote restorative experiences and support overall mental health.
References:
Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscape. Wiley: New York.
Appleton, J. (1983). Prospect and Refuge Revisited. Landscape Journal, 2(2), 91-103.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill: New York.
Dúll, A. (2009). A környezetpszichológia alapkérdései - Helyek, tárgyak, viselkedés. L'Harmattan: Budapest.
Dúll, A., Paksi, B., & Demetrovics, Zs. (2009). Pláza, ifjúság, életmód. Egészséglélektani vizsgálatok a fiatalok körében. L’Harmattan: Budapest.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.
Griffero, T. (2014). Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. Routledge: London.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Praeger: New York.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421.
Wohlwill, D. E. (1966). The Physical Environment: A Problem for a Psychology of Stimulation. Journal of Social Issues, 22(4), 29-38.
Wohlwill, D. E. (1976). Environmental Aesthetics: The Environment as a Source of Affect. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human Behavior and Environment (pp. 37-86). Springer: New York.